Re: PE Size and Waste

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Very confusing. Then I must be mistaken... I think I know the culprit.
It must be my NFS client that is wrong. If so, my apologies for
spreading misinformation.


On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:14:16 +0100, Luca Berra <bluca@comedia.it> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 05:52:57AM -0600, Myrddin Emrys wrote:
> >It appears that one PE can only hold a single file. Since my PE size
> >is 16MB, that means that the files on my LVM array are... well, less
> >than efficiently packed. What puzzles me is that this fact is never
> this is not true, there is no relation between PE size and filesystem.
> i wonder were you got this impression.
> 
> Regards,
> L.
> 
> --
> Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
>         Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
>  /"\
>  \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
>   X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
>  / \
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux