Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The patch still doesn't get better by that. And even if it was this > would clearly be a feature for 2.6, not 2.4. Without this patch there is no warranty that a LVM_snapshot is updated like the FS that is trying to replicate. DANGER !!! I only see one solution: to stop FS IO, and then # sync; sync; sync; lvcreate -s ... Maybe it's needed to write, in the code or a doc, some warning about this or to put a pointer to this patch :-? -- Software is like sex, it's better when it's bug free. _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
