http://otn.oracle.com/oramag/webcolumns/2002/techarticles/scalzo_linux02.htm l you will probably have to join otn to be able to read the article, but i'm not sure. reiserfs appears to work really well for lots of small files, but performs relatively poorly on a few really large files (ie database). in terms of performance oracle ranks them thusly ext2 ibm-jfs ext3 reiser > -----Original Message----- > From: Markus Schiltknecht [mailto:markus@bluegap.ch] > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2003 9:26 PM > To: linux-lvm@sistina.com > Subject: RE: EXT3 vs Reiserfs > > > Hi again, > > On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:14, Little, Chris wrote: > > It also depends on your workload. If you are serving a > large database, > > reiser (the last i heard) is probably a bad choice. > > why is that? thought reiser was faster than ext3 while ext3 would be > considered more stable (in general). > > Before getting ways off topic: where can I find a good comparison / > discussion on different filesystems? > > Thanks for your suggestions > > Markus > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ > _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
