Reiserfs has in some cases better performance. But resiserfs (in 2.4) has NO bad block management capabilities.. So, if your drive gets bad blocks, you can very quickly be rebuilding your entire filesystem ( I lost a TB on a RAID where one drive developed some bad blocks.) Just keep in mind stability. Matt Schillinger mschilli@vss.fsi.com On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 08:39, Yanick Quirion wrote: > Hi all, > > Could you please tell what is the best filesystem for linux between ext3 and reiserfs? > > I know that ext3 can handle ACLs and not online fs extend, and reiserfs do not seems to support ACLs (I found some patches for kernel 2.4.21, but there are errors when I apply them to the kernel sources), but can be extend while it's online. > > I'm just asking for your personal opinion and knowledge with them. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > > ----------- > Yanick Quirion > Administrateur RÃseau/Network Manager > NEOKIMIA INC. > Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke > 3e Ãtage (Ãdifice Z5) > 3001 12e avenue Nord > Sherbrooke, QuÃbec > CANADA > J1H 5N4 > > TÃl.: +1 819 820-6040 > Direct: +1 819 820-6855 > Fax.: +1 819 820-6841 > > email: Yanick.Quirion@neokimia.com > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
