Accepted. Thanks, Heinz -- The LVM Guy -- On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:57:00PM -0800, Dale J. Stephenson wrote: > A minor patch to prevent a possible segfault -- if an error occurs > getting the lv list, vg_setup_pointers_for_snapshot doesn't do well. > Patch was originally generated against 1.0.3, but the bug still seems > to be in 1.0.6. > > --- 1.0.3/tools/lib/vg_status_with_pv_and_lv.c.orig Thu Apr 11 10:45:18 2002 > +++ 1.0.3/tools/lib/vg_status_with_pv_and_lv.c Thu Apr 11 10:45:41 2002 > @@ -57,10 +57,10 @@ > for ( p = 0; pv[p] != NULL; p++) (*vg)->pv[p] = pv[p]; > for ( ; p < (*vg)->pv_max; p++) (*vg)->pv[p] = NULL; > for ( l = 0; l < (*vg)->lv_max; l++) (*vg)->lv[l] = lv[l]; > - } > > - /* Set up core pointers for snapshots */ > - vg_setup_pointers_for_snapshots ( *vg); > + /* Set up core pointers for snapshots */ > + vg_setup_pointers_for_snapshots ( *vg); > + } > > debug_leave ( "vg_status_with_pv_and_lv -- LEAVING with ret: %d\n", ret); > return ret; > > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@sistina.com > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ *** Software bugs are stupid. Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them *** =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc. Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11 56242 Marienrachdorf Germany Mauelshagen@Sistina.com +49 2626 141200 FAX 924446 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
