On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:07:06AM +0100, Joe Thornber wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 11:56:23AM +0200, Stephan Austermuehle wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:44:30AM +0100, Joe Thornber wrote: > > > > > Curious, as far as I know people are using LVM1 snapshots > > > successfully with xfs. > > > > To be pretty correct: I used the VFS lock patch from LVM 1.1-rc2 with > > LVM 1.0.4 because this doesn't give any rejects. But I had the problem > > with previous LVM versions with it's own VFS lock patch, too. > > > > At the moment I have two systems that cause trouble: One SuSE 7.0 > > based which is running about 2,5 years and one freshly installed > > Debian Woody system. Both have different hardware, compiler, libc, > > etc. Seems to be Kernel/LVM/XFS related. > > It wouldn't surprise me if there were problems with the 1.1rc2 kernel > patch since snapshots have been changed in that release ... but you > are using 1.0.4. I think he means the VFS lock patch in 1.1rc2 - which should be fine. It might be a stack size issue ? patrick _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
