Re: [linux-lvm] has anyone used LVM in a HA cluster?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> which may backfire, if both nodes think the other one is down (split
> brain again) and start the shutdown procedure. okay, this is a very rare
> situation, and may happen only under strange load and scheduling
> parameters, but it will happen as any other "very rare situation" happens
> ;-). especially in HA environments they seem to happen much more often
> then in simple single point of failure environments ;-) you won'Ät loosew
> your filesystem, but the service is unavailable.

Nothing will give you 100%: eventually the switchover methods
introduce more marginal P(fail) than the original setup had.
Joy of reliability studies is figuring how to take the first
partial of P(Fail) w/ respect to the switchover systems and
set it to zero... Turns out the most reliable answer is a swag
anyway :-)

--
Steven Lembark                               2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing                       Chicago, IL 60647
                                            +1 800 762 1582

_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@sistina.com
http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Linux Clusters]     [Device Mapper]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux