On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 07:33:27PM +0200, svetljo wrote: > > > Joe Thornber wrote: > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:17:30PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > > > >>I think things like stability and features are more important atm for > >>LVM2, than supporting linux 2.5 is.. > >> > >> > > > >Yes, I agree, 2.5 is definitely not my priority. Yet the annoying > >thing is I did port the last beta to 2.5, but seem to have mislaid the > >patch since then :( I'll keep looking. > > > >- Joe > > > > > really :( Yes, even though it sounds like a 'the dog ate my homework' excuse. > and what about inclusion in the kernel > or you'll may be try to push lvm-2 in the 2.4 kernel ? We're nearly feature complete with LVM2, so at that point 2.5 will jump up in priority. - Joe _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
