> Don't use raid5. I always use a combination of raid 1 and 10 for a > database server. If you have a database that frequently updates records > you don't want the extra write overhead. Yeah, what he said. However it is sometimes possible to get decent performance anyways from a hardware RAID5 device if the controller has enough cache (ie. a LOT). Generally speaking the Oracle "suggested layouts" for disks consist of 17-22 spindles, mirrored, with logical splits among the write-ahead log, the data area, and the redo log... Boy do I ever Not Miss working with Oracle. -- "To be suspended from the legal profession is the moral equivalent of being ostracized by child molesters." --Ian Rowan _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html