On Wednesday, 06 March 2002, at 15:56:06 -0600, Kirby C. Bohling wrote: > It's my understanding that the patches for XFS are pretty invasive > and that the latest XFS patches won't apply to the RedHat kernel because RH > has a different VM from the mainline kernel after 2.4.9 and XFS has lots > of VM dependencies in it. That is me just summarizing what I have heard > on other mailings lists, never used XFS myself. I thought SGI kept a > version of a RedHat derived distro ISO that would work with XFS that > was relatively recent like RH 7.0 based or 7.1 based. I can't remember > the link off hand. > Just for everyone's information, Andrea Arcangeli's kernel patches for 2.4.x series include XFS since at least version 2.4.18-rc4aa1 (what I am running now, fine so far). This -aa branch is said to be both stable and fast on the VM side, and could be interesting to give it a try. Greetings. -- José Luis Domingo López Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Woody (Linux 2.4.18-rc4aa1) jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
