>>>>> "JT" == Joe Thornber <thornber@btconnect.com> writes: JT> It's a nice idea, but with the current implementation there's no JT> way I'd want 100 snapshots of the same origin hanging around. They wouldn't all be of the same LV, fortunately; I split my VG up into lots of manageable chunks. (Large users get a volume to themselves, small users get grouped into various user volumes.) But still, I assume that you have some details of performance with the current snapshot implementation. Is it that bad? - J<
