Mr. Mason: Well I shall do that, but if svetljo has a link for a mandrake specific version of the patch for the exact kernel version I am running, I think I will prefer that solutions. I will however review your suggestions none the less. Very Respectfully, Stuart Blake Tener, IT3, USNR-R, N3GWG Beverly Hills, California VTU 1904G (Volunteer Training Unit) stuart@bh90210.net west coast: (310)-358-0202 P.O. Box 16043, Beverly Hills, CA 90209-2043 east coast: (215)-338-6005 P.O. Box 45859, Philadelphia, PA 19149-5859 Telecopier: (419)-715-6073 fax to email gateway via www.efax.com (it's free!) JOIN THE US NAVY RESERVE, SERVE YOUR COUNTRY, AND BENEFIT FROM IT ALL. Friday, September 14, 2001 9:30 AM -----Original Message----- From: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com [mailto:linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com]On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 6:52 AM To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Lock Patch On Friday, September 14, 2001 09:55:00 AM +0100 Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:00:47PM -0700, IT3 Stuart B. Tener, USNR-R > wrote: >> List members: >> >> I am curious; if I am running 2.4.8-12mdk (Mandrake 8,0), which lock >> patch do I use the 2.4.4 version or the 2.4.9 version? >> >> > > I would try the 2.4.4 one. If that doesn't apply then try the 2.4.9. You could also look for drop_super() in fs/super.c. If it is there, use the 2.4.9 patch, if it isn't, use the 2.4.4 patch. I'm guessing you'll need the 2.4.4 one. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-lvm mailing list linux-lvm@sistina.com http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
