Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 08/03/2015 08:22 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> thermal_zone_of_sensor_register is documented as returning a pointer
>> to either a valid thermal_zone_device on success, or a corresponding
>> ERR_PTR() value.
>>
>> In contrast, the function returns NULL when THERMAL_OF is configured
>> off. Fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
Thanks, Guenter.
>> ---
>> include/linux/thermal.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> index 037e9df..a47b34a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static inline struct thermal_zone_device *
>> thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id, void *data,
>> const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops *ops)
>> {
>> - return NULL;
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
>> }
>>
>> static inline
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
