Hi Punit, On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:14:36PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > The thermal code uses int, long and unsigned long for temperatures > > in different places. > > > > Using an unsigned type limits the thermal framework to positive > > temperatures without need. Also several drivers currently will report > > temperatures near UINT_MAX for temperatures below 0°C. This will probably > > immediately shut the machine down due to overtemperature if started below > > 0°C. > > > > 'long' is 64bit on several architectures. This is not needed since INT_MAX °mC > > is above the melting point of all known materials. > > > > Consistently use a plain 'int' for temperatures throughout the thermal code and > > the drivers. This only changes the places in the drivers where the temperature > > is passed around as pointer, when drivers internally use another type this is > > not changed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for moving over the thermal sub-system in Linux to consistently > use a single type. > > In your patch, you missed migrating over power_allocator governor and > it's associated trace events. It got merged for v4.2. > > Could you incorporate something like below in your next version? It seems I have changed drivers/thermal/power_allocator.c but missed include/trace/events/thermal_power_allocator.h. Please check out the v2 patch I just sent. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
