On 07/22/2015 09:30 AM, Denis Carikli wrote:
Signed-off-by: Denis Carikli <denis@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
i2c drivers do not need explicit devicetree support. Guenter
drivers/hwmon/lm92.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c index cfaf70b..a1e10cd 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm92.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/jiffies.h> /* @@ -386,6 +387,13 @@ static int lm92_probe(struct i2c_client *new_client, * Module and driver stuff */ +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static const struct of_device_id lm92_of_match[] = { + { .compatible = "national,lm92", }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, lm92_of_match); +#endif + static const struct i2c_device_id lm92_id[] = { { "lm92", 0 }, /* max6635 could be added here */ @@ -397,6 +405,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver lm92_driver = { .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON, .driver = { .name = "lm92", + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(lm92_of_match), }, .probe = lm92_probe, .id_table = lm92_id,
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors