On 05/27/2015 02:25 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Guenter, In this commit: http://www.lm-sensors.org/changeset/6260 You listed 0x37 as a possible address for the TMP435. While this is correct, I don't think we want to probe this address. Currently we do not probe it for any other chip, and we even removed it explicitly in the past: http://www.lm-sensors.org/changeset/3233 In the light of recent reports of display breakage caused by sensors-detect I would like to play it safe and not probe address 0x37 (which is used by some EEPROMs as well as the DDC/CI interface.) While less critical, it might also make sense to remove 0x37 from normal_i2c[] in the tmp401 driver. Users with a TMP435 as this address can always instantiate it explicitly. What do you think?
Ok with me. 0x37 is also scanned by the atxp1 driver, so I assume we would have to remove it from both for it to make a difference. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
