On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 10:28:59AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/03/2014 05:27 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > >>+Optional properties: > >>+ Name of the optional regulator subnode must be "regulators". > >>+ - #address-cells must be 1. > >What's the single address cell used for? > I think this is required by the regulator bindings. > Other regulators use the same, though they don't typically > mention it in the properties list but only in the examples. Nope, nothing to do with regulator that I'm aware of and I've not seen any examples (but I don't tend to review users too often). > >Mark, what's the preferred scheme for identifying regulators in a > >container node? > >>+ - regulator-name: arbitrary name for regulator > >Drop the 'aribtarary'. Either this should be the name of the regulator > >on the board, or it shouldn't be necessary. > Not sure if it even needs to be documented here. It is already documented > in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt. Document by reference then? It really should be the name of the supply provided by the regulator, that wording is probably good. Given that it's a standard regulator property I'd not document it here at all, just refer to the generic bindings and say any suitable properties there can be used.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
