On 10/02/2014 04:20 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:05:49PM -0500, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add support for simple on/off control of each channel.
This is basically fine but the regulator API has moved on a bit with the
DT handling over the time you've been working on this.
Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
v2: Remove '#include <linux/regulator/machine.h>'
Only one regulator per pmbus device
Put this after the --- as covered in SubmittingPatches.
+static int _pmbus_regulator_on_off(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
+{
+ struct device *dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev);
+ struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev->parent);
+ u8 page = rdev_get_id(rdev);
+
+ return pmbus_update_byte_data(client, page, PMBUS_OPERATION,
+ PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON,
+ enable ? PB_OPERATION_CONTROL_ON : 0);
+}
+
+static int pmbus_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{
+ return _pmbus_regulator_on_off(rdev, 1);
+}
I'm not sure factoring out the code actually won much here.
+ np_regulators = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, "regulators");
+ if (!np_regulators)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = of_regulator_match(dev, np_regulators, info->reg_matches,
+ info->num_regulators);
+ of_node_put(np_regulators);
We now have helpers in the regulator core for this - set of_match and
regulators_node in the regulator descriptor and the core will resolve
this stuff for you and...
+ if (pdata && pdata->reg_init_data) {
+ config.init_data = &pdata->reg_init_data[i];
+ } else {
+ config.init_data = info->reg_matches[i].init_data;
+ config.of_node = info->reg_matches[i].of_node;
+ }
...you can just drop the else case (and check for reg_init_data) here.
Guess we'll need another version after all.
Alan, in that case please provide prototyles for the new API functions
introduced in patch 2/4.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
