Re: [PATCH 1/2] hwmon, fam15h_power: Make actual power reporting conditional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/16/2014 10:52 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:38:38AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
power1_input should only be reported for Fam15h, Models 00h-0fh
So, introduce a is_visible function to take care of this.

As suggested by Guenter here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141038145616437&w=2

Suggested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
index 4a7cbfa..5ca24de 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
@@ -93,13 +93,30 @@ static ssize_t show_power_crit(struct device *dev,
  }
  static DEVICE_ATTR(power1_crit, S_IRUGO, show_power_crit, NULL);
+static umode_t fam15h_power_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+				       struct attribute *attr,
+				       int index)
+{
+	/* power1_input is only reported for Fam15h, Models 00h-0fh */
+	if (!strcmp(attr->name, "power1_input") &&
	if (attr == &dev_attr_power1_input.attr &&

works just as well and is simpler.

Ok.

+	   (boot_cpu_data.x86 != 0x15 || boot_cpu_data.x86_model > 0xf)) {
+		return 0;
+	}
+

I just noticed: I don't really need opening/closing parenthesis here. Shall fix and send V2.

+	return attr->mode;
+}
+

Thanks,
-Aravind.

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux