Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers/mfd/menf21bmc: introduce MEN 14F021P00 BMC MFD Core driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:30:46PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Andreas Werner wrote:
> > The MEN 14F021P00 Board Management Controller provides an
> > I2C interface to the host to access the feature implemented in the BMC.
> > The BMC is a PIC Microntroller assembled on CPCI Card from MEN Mikroelektronik
> > and on a few Box/Display Computer.
> > 
> > Added MFD Core driver, supporting the I2C communication to the device.
> > 
> > The MFD driver currently supports the following features:
> >  	- Watchdog
> >  	- LEDs
> > 	- Hwmon (voltage monitoring)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Werner <andreas.werner@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig     |  12 +++++
> >  drivers/mfd/Makefile    |   1 +
> >  drivers/mfd/menf21bmc.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 145 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/menf21bmc.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > index b8d9ca0..bf155b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -453,6 +453,18 @@ config MFD_MAX8998
> >  	  additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
> >  	  of the device.
> >  
> > +config MFD_MENF21BMC
> > +	tristate "MEN 14F021P00 Board Management Controller Support"
> > +	depends on I2C=y
> 
> Why must I2C be built-in?

Sorry my mistake, I2C must not be built in.

> 
> > +	select MFD_CORE
> > +	help
> > +	  Say yes here to add support for the MEN 14F021P00 BMC
> > +	  which is a Board Management Controller connected to the I2C bus.
> > +	  The device supports multiple sub-devices like LED, HWMON  and WDT.
> > +	  This driver provides common support for accessing the devices;
> > +	  additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the
> > +	  functionality of the BMC device.
> > +
> 
> Apart from that the patch looks good to me.
> 
> I'm assuming this can go in via the MFD tree by itself?

Yes why not.
Do you want to have a single patch for the MFD or
is it better to wait for the other Subsystem maintainer that I 
can resend a patch v5?


Regards
Andy

> 
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> -- 
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux