2014-07-31 22:46 GMT+08:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 07/31/2014 12:30 AM, Axel Lin wrote: >> >> On platforms with sizeof(int) < sizeof(long), writing a temperature >> limit larger than MAXINT will result in unpredictable limit values >> written to the chip. >> Clamp the input values to the supported limits first to fix the problem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/hwmon/lm77.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm77.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm77.c >> index 5ceb443..72a02b0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm77.c >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm77.c >> @@ -80,8 +80,7 @@ struct lm77_data { >> */ >> static inline s16 LM77_TEMP_TO_REG(int temp) >> { >> - int ntemp = clamp_val(temp, LM77_TEMP_MIN, LM77_TEMP_MAX); >> - return (ntemp / 500) * 8; >> + return (temp / 500) * 8; >> } >> >> static inline int LM77_TEMP_FROM_REG(s16 reg) >> @@ -176,7 +175,7 @@ static ssize_t set_temp(struct device *dev, struct >> device_attribute *devattr, >> return err; >> >> mutex_lock(&data->update_lock); >> - data->temp[nr] = val; >> + data->temp[nr] = clamp_val(val, LM77_TEMP_MIN, LM77_TEMP_MAX); >> lm77_write_value(client, temp_regs[nr], LM77_TEMP_TO_REG(val)); > > > Found it: Clamp applied to data->temp[nr], but you are still using val here. > Has to be LM77_TEMP_TO_REG(data->temp[nr]). Thanks a lot. I'll send a v3 soon. Regards, Axel _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors