On 7/14/2014 2:51 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:23:08PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
@@ -211,6 +228,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id k10temp_id_table[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F3) },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M10H_F3) },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F3) },
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M60H_NB_F3) },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F3) },
{ PCI_VDEVICE(AMD, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_M30H_NB_F3) },
{}
diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
index 7fa3173..3c8e328 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M10H_F3 0x1403
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F3 0x141d
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F4 0x141e
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M60H_NB_F3 0x1573
I'm assuming this is used somewhere else besides k10temp.c?
Yeah, will most likely need to add EDAC bits. But that is something I
can't test now.
So will have to do it only in due time.. :)
-Aravind.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors