Re: [RFT][PATCH 1/2] hwmon: (adm9240) Avoid forward declaration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/04/2014 01:20 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Guenter,

On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:10:14 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 07/04/2014 05:23 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Note that support for banked registers could be added if you think this
would help.

That would be quite useful. How would you implement it, though ? You would have
to have a means to tell the driver "this is a bank register". Another module
parameter, maybe ?

Not just "this is a bank register". You also most specify which bits
set the bank number (which in turn define the maximum number of banks),
and the range of banked registers.

I did not think about it in depth yet, but there are two options that
come to my mind: module parameters indeed, or sysfs attributes. We
could create a sysfs directory for every client address and have
writable attributes bank_reg, bank_mask, banked_start_reg and
banked_end_reg in that directory. Not sure exactly where actually,
maybe we would need to introduce a virtual i2c-stub device, or use
debugfs.

Module parameters would work too, that's probably easier to implement
that way, but that's also less flexible, as you have to setup
everything upon module loading. That might be just fine though, as
being able to change the bank setup at run-time has little practical
value IMHO.


Hi Jean,

At least with my module test scripts, I re-load  the i2c-stub driver
before testing a new chip, to make sure that its state is 'clean'.
So module parameters work just fine for me.

Could we use a single module parameter ?

bank_reg=<reg> <mask>

would probably do for a start, and mask could even be optional. Not sure
if banked_start_reg and banked_end_reg are necessary. If so the above
could be extended to

bank_reg=<reg> <mask> <start> <end>

That would not work for PMBus chips - those are so complex that
it is unlikely we'll ever be able to simulate one without much
more complexity - it would require the ability to return a failure
when trying to access unsupported registers/commands, and that
on each of the pages.

Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux