On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:27 +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand the question. The other patch from the series > > The code above seems to change from > > data->reg = devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config(&pdev->dev); > if (!data->reg) > return -ENODEV; > > to > > data->reg = devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config(&pdev->dev); > if (IS_ERR(data->reg)) > return PTR_ERR(data->reg); > > as part of this patch. This suggests that the return value from > devm_regmap_init_vexpress_config may have changed from NULL to > ERR_PTR. Is my understanding wrong ? No, you've got it right, but it's me making a mistake in patch splitting - it is supposed to be a part of the first patch. Thanks for spotting this! Pawel _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
