On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 18:37 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 13:15 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In "Device Tree powered" systems, platform devices are usually > > > massively populated with of_platform_populate() call, executed > > > at some level of initcalls, either by generic architecture > > > or by platform-specific code. > > > > Go read Grant's and my comments from your last posting. > > Right, I can't explain why I missed those. Will do right now. Actually I can't seem to find it in my mail archive, but I remember you were saying that it shouldn't spoil into the driver base code. You're probably right, so the updated patch will be limited to of_platform_* API. Grant was suggesting that I shouldn't be using the device model if I have to initialize some early stuff. The thing is that my stuff is not that early at all. The device model works for me perfectly, as long as I can initialize 3 crucial devices in a correct order (and *then* do mass population). And the init levels are perfect for this job. The only thing I need is a small refinement in the way DT-based devices are populated and this is exactly what I propose. Hope it makes more sense now. Cheers! Pawel _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
