On Saturday, March 08, 2014 12:08:31 PM Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 14:52:30 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:04:29PM +0100, Manuel Krause wrote: > > > Hi, and thanks for the quick response! > > > No special fancy "fan control policy". 'fancontrol' isn't up or > > > running. > > > Vanilla kernels 3.11.* and 3.12.* had been working on here without > > > any extra work. > > > -- > > > # sensors > > > acpitz-virtual-0 > > > Adapter: Virtual device > > > temp1: +71.0°C (crit = +256.0°C) > > > temp2: +69.0°C (crit = +110.0°C) > > > temp3: +52.0°C (crit = +105.0°C) > > > temp4: +25.0°C (crit = +110.0°C) > > > temp5: +58.0°C (crit = +110.0°C) > > > > > > coretemp-isa-0000 > > > Adapter: ISA adapter > > > Core 0: +62.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) > > > Core 1: +60.0°C (high = +105.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) > > > -- > > > My notebook (HP/Compaq 6730b) does not have a seperate fan sensor. > > > This is with 3.12.13 with my normal workload. > > > > > > Please, trust my above mentionned values of 94 °C vs. 74°C as I > > > don't like to boot 3.13.6 anymore, to avoid harm to the notebook's > > > casing. > > > > Understood. Unfortunately, we'll need to get information > > from the new kernel to be able to track down the problem. > > Indeed. Not only the run-time temperatures, but also the high and crit > limits. > > > > But I'd do to test any improvement-patch. > > > > So far I have no idea what is going on. I don't see anything in the > > drivers providing above data that would explain the behavior, > > but I might be missing something. > > Looks like a regression in the acpi subsystem or in power management, > not hwmon. Hwmon is merely reporting the temperatures, it's not > responsible for the actual temperatures. > > A bisection would certainly help, but of course that would require > booting to a bad kernel half of the time, which I understand Manual > wouldn't enjoy. > > The only two components which I think can reach such high temperatures > in a laptop are the CPU and the GPU. I suppose that the "94 °C vs. > 74°C" refers to acpitz's temp1? If the the temperatures reported by > coretemp remain the same, then I can only suppose that temp1 is the GPU > temperature. Please tell us which GPU is in this laptop, and which > driver you're using. Also it would be good to know which cpufreq and cpuidle drivers are in use and whether or not 3.14-rc5 has the problem. -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
