Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 12/08/2013 11:58 AM, Ben Gamari wrote: >> There isn't reallly any configuration necessary so the bindings are >> consequently quite simple. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > i2c devices don't require explicit bindings unless driver specific bindings are needed. > Please see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/trivial-devices.txt for details. > You might want to consider adding the device into the trivial-devices.txt file instead. > Thanks! I was not aware of this. Patch coming. How does the devicetree code handle the vendor prefix in the compatible field? For instance, the AD7414 has compatible="ad,ad7414" yet the driver never mentions "ad", only "ad7414". Is the vendor prefix stripped off while searching for compatible drivers? On that note, it seems that adt7461 is listed twice in this file; once as "adi,adt7461" and again as "adt7461". Is this expected? Thanks again. Cheers, - Ben
Attachment:
pgphb78pRyzsq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
