On 10/30/2013 11:41 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:18:24 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> Add bit defines for the status register. And add a function
>> lm90_is_tripped() which will read status register and return
>> tripped or not, then lm90_alert can call it directly, and in the
>> future the IRQ thread also can use it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index cdff742..1da2eff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -179,6 +179,18 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
>> #define LM90_HAVE_TEMP3 (1 << 6) /* 3rd temperature sensor */
>> #define LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT (1 << 7) /* Broken alert */
>>
>> +/* LM90 status */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_LTHRM (1 << 0) /* local THERM limit tripped */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_RTHRM (1 << 1) /* remote THERM limit tripped */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_OPEN (1 << 2) /* remote is an open circuit */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_RLOW (1 << 3) /* remote low temp limit tripped */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_RHIGH (1 << 4) /* remote high temp limit tripped */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_LLOW (1 << 5) /* local low temp limit tripped */
>> +#define LM90_STATUS_LHIGH (1 << 6) /* local high temp limit tripped */
>> +
>> +#define MAX6696_STATUS2_RLOW (1 << 3) /* remote2 low temp limit tripped */
>> +#define MAX6696_STATUS2_RHIGH (1 << 4) /* remote2 high temp limit tripped */
>> +
>> /*
>> * Driver data (common to all clients)
>> */
>> @@ -1391,6 +1403,36 @@ static void lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client *client)
>> i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_W_CONFIG1, config);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool lm90_is_tripped(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> + struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u8 status, status2 = 0;
>> +
>> + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &status);
>> +
>> + if (data->kind == max6696)
>> + lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &status2);
>> +
>> + if ((status & 0x7f) == 0 && (status2 & 0xfe) == 0)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + if (status & (LM90_STATUS_LLOW | LM90_STATUS_LHIGH | LM90_STATUS_LTHRM))
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 1);
>> + if (status & (LM90_STATUS_RLOW | LM90_STATUS_RHIGH | LM90_STATUS_RTHRM))
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 2);
>> + if (status & LM90_STATUS_OPEN)
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "temp%d diode open, please check!\n", 2);
>> +
>> + if (status2 & (MAX6696_STATUS2_RLOW | MAX6696_STATUS2_RHIGH))
>> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> + "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 3);
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1489,36 +1531,17 @@ static int lm90_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>
>> static void lm90_alert(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned int flag)
>> {
>> - struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - u8 config, alarms, alarms2 = 0;
>> -
>> - lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
>> -
>> - if (data->kind == max6696)
>> - lm90_read_reg(client, MAX6696_REG_R_STATUS2, &alarms2);
>> -
>> - if ((alarms & 0x7f) == 0 && (alarms2 & 0xfe) == 0) {
>> - dev_info(&client->dev, "Everything OK\n");
>> - } else {
>> - if (alarms & 0x61)
>> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> - "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 1);
>> - if (alarms & 0x1a)
>> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> - "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 2);
>> - if (alarms & 0x04)
>> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> - "temp%d diode open, please check!\n", 2);
>> -
>> - if (alarms2 & 0x18)
>> - dev_warn(&client->dev,
>> - "temp%d out of range, please check!\n", 3);
>> -
>> + if (lm90_is_tripped(client)) {
>
> You are reading LM90_REG_R_STATUS here...
>
>> /*
>> * Disable ALERT# output, because these chips don't implement
>> * SMBus alert correctly; they should only hold the alert line
>> * low briefly.
>> */
>> + struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> + u8 config, alarms;
>> +
>> + lm90_read_reg(client, LM90_REG_R_STATUS, &alarms);
>
> ... and here again. I already complained about this in my previous
> review of this patch, and you were supposed to address it, but you did
> not. As a result I am still not happy with this patch and I can't apply
> it, sorry.
It's so sorry, I made a mistake, I sent a old patch for this. I will
sent the right one right now.
Sorry again.
Wei.
>
>> +
>> if ((data->flags & LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT)
>> && (alarms & data->alert_alarms)) {
>> dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Disabling ALERT#\n");
>> @@ -1526,6 +1549,8 @@ static void lm90_alert(struct i2c_client *client, unsigned int flag)
>> i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, LM90_REG_W_CONFIG1,
>> config | 0x80);
>> }
>> + } else {
>> + dev_info(&client->dev, "Everything OK\n");
>> }
>> }
>>
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
