Re: RFC: device thermal limits represented in device tree nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 17:15 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> > Another way, as I mentioned in the original RFC, an option would be to
> > have the thermal_zone node not embedded in any device node. But them, we
> > would need to firmly link it to other device nodes, to describe what is
> > monitored and what is used for monitoring. 
> 
> You mean the zone nodes would live at the top level of the tree? To my
> mind the root represents the device (the board, whatever you call it),

What I wanted to say was: ... so the zone would still be embedded in a
device node :-)

Pawel



_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux