Am 18.07.2013 01:36, schrieb Guenter Roeck: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:26:14PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> We cleaned up this code to use ARRAY_SIZE() instead of just the number >> 4. The problem is that data->reg_temp[] has 5 elements and we actually >> wanted ARRAY_SIZE(data->temp) which has 4 elements. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Hi Dan, > > good catch, except that the array size of data->temp[] should be 5, not 4. > So the real culprit is commit 7cbbd6a (Add support for critical low/high > temperature limits on NCT6106) which increased the size of reg_temp but not the > size of temp. > > Do you want to send me a patch fixing that, or should I take care of it ? > > Thanks, > Guenter hi Guenther, is an array the way to go here ? To avoid that kind of problems they sould be connected some how. Is it possible to replace the array with a malloc() ? re, wh _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
