On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 09:59:57PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 12:48:03 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Another option would be to create a class attribute to return the parent driver > > name for spi and i2c devices and otherwise the hwmon driver name. This would > > reduce the amount of code needed in the drivers. Jean, do you see a problem with > > that approach (except that we would have to remove explicit name attributes from > > existing drivers) ? > > A class attribute is what I had in mind in my previous reply. However I > do not understand the "hwmon driver name" in your sentence above. s/driver/device/ > Device name != driver name. But well I'm sure I'll understand what you > mean as soon as you show us a candidate implementation ;) > Guess so :) Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
