On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 03:30:31PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
> some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
> do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
> commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
> is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
> with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
>
> After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
> the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
> we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
>
> This removes all the drivers/hwmon uses of the __cpuinit macros
> from all C files.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> [This commit is part of the __cpuinit removal work. If you don't see
> any problems with it, then you don't have to do anything ; it will be
> submitted with all the rest of the __cpuinit removal work. On the
> other hand, if you want to carry this patch in with your other pending
> changes so as to handle conflicts with other pending work yourself, then
> that is fine too, as the commits can largely be treated independently.
> For more information, please see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/20/513 ]
>
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index ade35cf..2e5e2dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct tjmax {
> int tjmax;
> };
>
> -static const struct tjmax __cpuinitconst tjmax_table[] = {
> +static const struct tjmax tjmax_table[] = {
> { "CPU 230", 100000 }, /* Model 0x1c, stepping 2 */
> { "CPU 330", 125000 }, /* Model 0x1c, stepping 2 */
> { "CPU CE4110", 110000 }, /* Model 0x1c, stepping 10 Sodaville */
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct tjmax_model {
>
> #define ANY 0xff
>
> -static const struct tjmax_model __cpuinitconst tjmax_model_table[] = {
> +static const struct tjmax_model tjmax_model_table[] = {
> { 0x1c, 10, 100000 }, /* D4xx, K4xx, N4xx, D5xx, K5xx, N5xx */
> { 0x1c, ANY, 90000 }, /* Z5xx, N2xx, possibly others
> * Note: Also matches 230 and 330,
> @@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ static const struct tjmax_model __cpuinitconst tjmax_model_table[] = {
> { 0x36, ANY, 100000 }, /* Atom Cedar Trail/Cedarview (N2xxx, D2xxx) */
> };
>
> -static int __cpuinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id,
> - struct device *dev)
> +static int adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *dev)
> {
> /* The 100C is default for both mobile and non mobile CPUs */
>
> @@ -317,8 +316,7 @@ static int __cpuinit adjust_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id,
> return tjmax;
> }
>
> -static int __cpuinit get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id,
> - struct device *dev)
> +static int get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *dev)
> {
> int err;
> u32 eax, edx;
> @@ -367,8 +365,8 @@ static int create_name_attr(struct platform_data *pdata,
> return device_create_file(dev, &pdata->name_attr);
> }
>
> -static int __cpuinit create_core_attrs(struct temp_data *tdata,
> - struct device *dev, int attr_no)
> +static int create_core_attrs(struct temp_data *tdata, struct device *dev,
> + int attr_no)
> {
> int err, i;
> static ssize_t (*const rd_ptr[TOTAL_ATTRS]) (struct device *dev,
> @@ -401,7 +399,7 @@ exit_free:
> }
>
>
> -static int __cpuinit chk_ucode_version(unsigned int cpu)
> +static int chk_ucode_version(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
>
> @@ -417,7 +415,7 @@ static int __cpuinit chk_ucode_version(unsigned int cpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct platform_device __cpuinit *coretemp_get_pdev(unsigned int cpu)
> +static struct platform_device *coretemp_get_pdev(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> u16 phys_proc_id = TO_PHYS_ID(cpu);
> struct pdev_entry *p;
> @@ -434,8 +432,7 @@ static struct platform_device __cpuinit *coretemp_get_pdev(unsigned int cpu)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct temp_data __cpuinit *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu,
> - int pkg_flag)
> +static struct temp_data *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
> {
> struct temp_data *tdata;
>
> @@ -453,8 +450,8 @@ static struct temp_data __cpuinit *init_temp_data(unsigned int cpu,
> return tdata;
> }
>
> -static int __cpuinit create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
> +static int create_core_data(struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int cpu,
> + int pkg_flag)
> {
> struct temp_data *tdata;
> struct platform_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -524,7 +521,7 @@ exit_free:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void __cpuinit coretemp_add_core(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
> +static void coretemp_add_core(unsigned int cpu, int pkg_flag)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> int err;
> @@ -607,7 +604,7 @@ static struct platform_driver coretemp_driver = {
> .remove = coretemp_remove,
> };
>
> -static int __cpuinit coretemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> +static int coretemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> int err;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -651,7 +648,7 @@ exit:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> +static void coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct pdev_entry *p, *n;
> u16 phys_proc_id = TO_PHYS_ID(cpu);
> @@ -667,7 +664,7 @@ static void __cpuinit coretemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex);
> }
>
> -static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
> +static bool is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
> {
> int i;
>
> @@ -681,7 +678,7 @@ static bool __cpuinit is_any_core_online(struct platform_data *pdata)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> +static void get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> struct platform_device *pdev = coretemp_get_pdev(cpu);
> @@ -723,7 +720,7 @@ static void __cpuinit get_core_online(unsigned int cpu)
> coretemp_add_core(cpu, 0);
> }
>
> -static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> +static void put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> int i, indx;
> struct platform_data *pdata;
> @@ -771,7 +768,7 @@ static void __cpuinit put_core_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> coretemp_device_remove(cpu);
> }
>
> -static int __cpuinit coretemp_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> +static int coretemp_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long) hcpu;
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
> index 76f157b..38944e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct pdev_entry {
> static LIST_HEAD(pdev_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(pdev_list_mutex);
>
> -static int __cpuinit via_cputemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> +static int via_cputemp_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> int err;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ exit:
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void __cpuinit via_cputemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> +static void via_cputemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> struct pdev_entry *p;
>
> @@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static void __cpuinit via_cputemp_device_remove(unsigned int cpu)
> mutex_unlock(&pdev_list_mutex);
> }
>
> -static int __cpuinit via_cputemp_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> - unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +static int via_cputemp_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> {
> unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long) hcpu;
>
> --
> 1.8.1.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
