On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 04:50 +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote: > Does each little driver really need a MAINTAINERS entry? Hi Hans. I think a lot of those driver MAINTAINERS entries are maybe a little useful when the driver is just written but are progressively less useful after a few months. I once wrote a little script to look at whether or not each listed maintainer had signed-off on a patch to a listed file block for whatever time frame. Most had not. I'd rather people put their names in CREDITS than MAINTAINERS if they want posterity entries. > In my opinion, it should only be there if it is clear > that it's not just a short project work. I mostly agree with that, but sometimes it's useful when the implementation is a bit complex and the original author may still have some memory of the complexity. Anyway, I'm not resubmitting that patch. If you want to remove yourself from whatever entry, please do. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
