On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:09:01PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Fri, 24 May 2013 07:56:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 09:05:50AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:22:22 -0700, Robert Coulson wrote: > > > > Due to a lack of device and vendor identification registers, the > > > > Dallas/Maxim DS16xx devices cannot be uniquely detected, sometimes > > > > resulting in false positives. Therefore, the detection function is > > > > being removed in favor of explicit device instantiation. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Coulson <rob.coulson@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/hwmon/ds1621 | 25 +++++++++++------------ > > > > drivers/hwmon/ds1621.c | 48 -------------------------------------------- > > > > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > v2: > > > > - removed detect function references in ds1621 documentation > > > > - replaced deprecated with removed and fixed a spelling error > > > > v3: > > > > - removed scanned addresses info, tables, and list > > > > (...) > > > > > > Thanks for the update, looks good to me. > > > > > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Guenter, please pick and apply. > > > > Applied to -next. > > Was this patch lost somehow? I can't see it in your tree. > Usually I keep it local for a day or two to ensure it passes nightly testing. In this case, I simply forgot to push the branch into the upstream repo. Too much work last week, sorry. It is now available. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
