Re: Nuvoton NCT5572D incorrectly detected as NCT6775F

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 06:05:10 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:24:26AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > (please CC me as I am not subscribed)
> > 
> > 
> > Dear Linux hwmon folks,
> > 
> > 
> > lately I was fooled to think my board ASRock E350M1 has a Nuvoton 6775F.
> > 
> >                 w83627ehf: Found NCT6775F chip at 0x290
> > 
> > Then I was pointed out that it actually has a Nuvoton NCT 5572D and
> > looking at the board, this is actually written on the chip. Searching
> > for that on the Web this was confirmed too [1][2][3].
> > 
> > Should the Linux message be changed to the following?
> > 
> >         w83627ehf: Found NCT6775F (or NCT5572D) chip at 0x290
> > 
> > Is it planned to add support for that the NCT5572D?
> > 
> I don't think so. Many of the superio chips have different labels - we would
> end up spending a lot of time trying to keep the labels up to date.
> Besides, that chip can also be labeled as NCT6772F or NCT6771F.
> So it should read
> 
>     w83627ehf: Found NCT6775F, or NCT6771F, or NCT6772F, or NCT5572D chip at 0x290
> 
> which would get a bit awkward. And then there is its original name, W83677HG-I,
> which we would presumably have to add as well.

"NCT6775F or compatible" is one way to name it, that would make
everyone happy I think.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux