Re: [PATCH 4/5] hwmon: (lm75) Tune resolution and sample time per chip

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 08:28:57AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 16:16:36 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Key question right now though is what to do with the nct6775 driver ...
> > I would really like to get it off my back. It just seems impossible
> > to get anyone to review it. Not really surprising given its size.
> > On the other side there is real demand for it, to the point that
> > at least archlinux already provides it. I wonder if I should just
> > push it into 3.10 and wait for any fallout. Do you have an opinion ?
> 
> Yes, please push it into 3.10. It's a new driver, so you're not going
> to cause any regression. Worst case, driver doesn't work properly for
> some users, or some feature is broken, this can't really be worse than
> having no driver at all.
> 
Ok, I'll do that.

> And if this ultimately lets us remove support for some chips from the
> w83627ehf driver and make it look sane again, I'm all for it.
> 
Makes sense. This also makes one of the patches I submitted for w83627ehf
unnecessary, as it affects nct6775/nct6776 support.

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux