On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:54:52AM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> This patch changes the irq state from high to the now default low
> state.
>
> This patch is dependent on the DA9055 MFD.
>
That statement is a bit confusing. Do you mean it depends on a patch submitted
for the DA9055 MFD ?
In other words, should this patch be pushed upstream through the mfd tree,
or through the hwmon tree ?
> This patch is tested on smdk6410 board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/da9055-hwmon.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/da9055-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/da9055-hwmon.c
> index 9465c05..dfd0db1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/da9055-hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/da9055-hwmon.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int da9055_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, hwmon_irq,
> NULL, da9055_auxadc_irq,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> "adc-irq", hwmon);
> if (ret != 0) {
> dev_err(hwmon->da9055->dev, "DA9055 ADC IRQ failed ret=%d\n",
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
