On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 03:53:54PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:37:35 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 06:20:06 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:45:10AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > Hi Guenter, > > > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:07:33 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > Seen with latest i2c-tools from svn repository. > > > > > > > > With the subversion repository having gone on vacation, "latest" > > > > doesn't mean much :( > > > > > > > Oh, right, "the latest one I have", which is svn revision 6075. Is that the > > > latest ? > > > > "svn status -u" says 6091 but I think this includes the changes to > > other trees (lm-sensors.) I have i2c-tools/CHANGES at revision 6083. > > The SVN repository should be back now, thanks to Axel Thimm. > I found the problem. -li2c must be specified after the .o files. Patch: diff --git a/tools/Module.mk b/tools/Module.mk index 1979248..bfd3250 100644 --- a/tools/Module.mk +++ b/tools/Module.mk @@ -21,16 +21,16 @@ TOOLS_TARGETS := i2cdetect i2cdump i2cset i2cget # $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cdetect: $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cdetect.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cbusses.o - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cdump: $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cdump.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cbusses.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/util.o - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cset: $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cset.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cbusses.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/util.o - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cget: $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cget.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/i2cbusses.o $(TOOLS_DIR)/util.o - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(TOOLS_LDFLAGS) # # Objects _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
