Re: [PATCH 9/9] hwmon: (it87) Report thermal sensor type as Intel PECI if appropriate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:24:04PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:09:00 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > One would think so, but that doesn't fit with Jean's observation that he has to
> > enter -128 degC (or possibly 128 degC) for a decent temperature reading.
> > 
> > Jean, does the temperature increase if you put load onto the system ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > And which value in temp3_offset makes the reported temperature match the
> > temperature reported by k10temp ?
> 
> temp3_offset value of 116000 makes them match.
> 
Good, so at least we know that we have the correct register. The only remaining
question is if we should make tempX_offset unsigned if a sensor is configured
for AMDTSI. Kind of odd, though, since it is signed for everything else and
might thus change sign when/if the sensor type is changed. Not sure what the
best approach might be.

Thanks,
Guenter

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux