Hi Guenter, Thanks for your quick response (and apologies about me being delayed), I appreciate your time! On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 16:24 +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote: > and a highly unusual way of, as much as I understand of it, bypass the hwmon > infrastructure as much as possible. I can assure you that it wasn't my aim. Generally, my platform has a lot of small "control" devices providing one sensor each. And as they are separate from the device model point of view, I wanted them to be logically grouped around a single hwmon device (I was actually looking at the coretemp driver). But it's not a big deal, really. > I don't even understand what you are trying to do, much less why you don't > just use the existing infrastructure, and I don't have time to try to figure > it out. Maybe Jean has time to review this driver, but not me. > > So, no, for my part I don't think it would be a good idea to rush this driver > into 3.7. > > Really, I would suggest to submit a standard hwmon driver (there are lots of > examples out there). Sure thing, I'll quickly spin a simplified version and post it for review. Thanks! Pawel _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
