Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:13:46PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Andreas Herrmann wrote: >>> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 09:50:25AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 06:34:16PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann >>>> wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>> fam15h_power-pci-00c4 Adapter: PCI adapter power1: >>>>> 85.74 W >>>>> >>>>> I read about this value, which would be the power >>>>> consumption of the CPU. If this would be correct, my cpu >>>>> wouldn't be a cpu but a light bulb :-) and the fan would >>>>> most probably run on maximum speed non stop (which it >>>>> doesn't do - it's running on minimum). >>>>> >>>> If they have a built-in AC unit, both temperature and power >>>> consumption would make sense. Hmm ... maybe I should apply >>>> for a patent on that idea :). >>>> >>>>> CPU: AMD FX(tm)-4100 Quad-Core Processor Board: >>>>> Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 Bios: Award F11 05/17/2012 >>>>> Kernel: 3.4.10-1.1-desktop 64 bit (openSUSE) lmsensors: >>>>> sensors-3.3.2-55.1.x86_64 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Do you need more information about the hardware? Feel free >>>>> to ask! >>> >>> What's the output of >>> >>> # setpci -s 18.5 0xe0.l >> >> Hmm, a few hours later and one s2ram / resume cycle in between, >> the power value is broken again. It's showing constantly power1: >> 85.74 W in idle mode. setpci now says: >> >> 00fff83e (first try) >> >> 00fffffe (all other tries) >> >> >> As I did it a few hours ago, I got 003930c9 and the reported >> values have been between 26 W and 40 W (sounds reasonable to me) >> - before and after entering setpci. >> > Looking into the driver, I suspect the power meter configuration > might not survive a suspend/resume cycle. What do you see after a > complete reboot ? After reboot (from running machine or from power off to power on), the values are as expected (= ok). Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
