Hi Jean,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:56:40AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:09:24 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > MAX1110 is similar to MAX1111, with 8 instead of 4 channels. MAX1112 and MAX1113
> > are similar to MAX1110 and MAX1111, with 4.096V reference voltage instead of
> > 2.048V.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ ... ]
> >
> > @@ -93,12 +100,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(max1111_read_channel);
> > static ssize_t show_name(struct device *dev,
> > struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > {
> > - return sprintf(buf, "max1111\n");
> > + struct max1111_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", data->name);
>
> Can't you use dev_name(dev) instead?
>
Would be nice, but dev_name(dev) is the name of the SPI device, eg spi0.0.
If I use dev_name, sensors output is:
spi0.0-spi-0-0
Adapter: SPI adapter
in0: +0.00 V
in1: +0.00 V
in2: +0.00 V
in3: +0.00 V
Other drivers all use the data->name approach as far as I can see.
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
