On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:59:11AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 04:23:04PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:30:05AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Applied. > > > > Thanks. > > > Looks like you did not include maintainers and/or subject mailing lists in your > > patch series, so I guess you won't get much feedback. > > Tree sweeps like this normally don't go through individual mainainers, it's just > not practical. > That is not the point. For my part I still like to know what is going on, at the very least to be able to avoid conflicts, and some maintainers tend to get a bit tense if they are not informed. Besides, I would consider it to be a common courtesy to inform maintainers about activity related to their area of responsibility. If you want the patch to go through some other tree, fine with me; I can drop it and give it an Ack. Your e-mail does not mention a target tree, though, and my psychic capabilities seem to be a bit erratic lately ;). Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
