Hi Sourav,
On 08/03/2012 02:35 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> update tmp102 temperature sensor to also use device tree.
>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
> index 0d466b9..a8a9060 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/tmp102.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> #define DRIVER_NAME "tmp102"
>
> @@ -284,8 +285,19 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id tmp102_id[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tmp102_id);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id temperature_dt_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,tmp102" },
Are you sure this is needed for this device?
There is an automatic binding done for I2C devices in the of_i2c core
code. So in theory, DT will be able to bind to any I2C device using the
already existing table: MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tmp102_id).
So I think this patch should not be needed.
Regards,
Benoit
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
