On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 19:11:04 +0530 > Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> [akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: fix comment layout] >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Donggeun Kim <dg77.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: SangWook Ju <sw.ju@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Durgadoss <durgadoss.r@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Something strange appears to have happened here? At a guess it seems > that the patches were in my tree, I sent them to someone (Len?), then > they were merged into linux-next by "someone" and then they fell > out of linux-next again? > > If so, they will hopefully come back soon. If not, something failed > fairly seriously. Hi Andrew, Yes you are right that this patches first came into your tree and then Len applied into his next tree for 3.5 merge. so they got into linux-next tree. After some last minute pull issues they could not be merged in 3.5 and Len dropped this series from his -next branch. I hope to get it accepted in 3.6 merge. I am aware that some work is going on for thermal framework improvement but that will have minimal changes on cpufreq cooling APIs and I hope to fix them as bug fix patches. > > > I took a look at re-merging these patches into my tree, but there are > significant conflicts with other work which has gone into linux-next. > Its my fault that I didn't check the hwmon-next branch. I will repost them after merging with hwmon-next branch. Thanks, Amit Daniel _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
