On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 16:17 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:41:07 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Atom CPUs don't have a register to retrieve TjMax. Detection so far was > > incomplete. Use the X86 model ID to improve it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v4: Rearranged code to check tjmax table entries first. > > > > v3: Reverted PCI code to avoid possible regressions. Run PCI code first, > > then override resulting value with table entry if one exists. > > Dropped entries for N2000 and D2000 CPUs as those all have a Tjmax of 100 C > > which we can detect separately based on the CPU model number. > > Dropped table entries for E6xx series, since the E6xx can not be > > distinguished from E6xxT using the model ID string (nor by any other means). > > > > v2: Dropped PCI dependencies > > Fixed 330 and 230 detection (2 spaces between CPU and 330/230) > > Added support for Cedar Creek CPUs > > Declared atom_tjmax as __cpuinitconst > > > > > > drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) > > (...) > > Applied, thanks. > > I have also updated my standalone driver at: > http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/misc/coretemp/ > with a version with all your patches applied. > Great, thanks! Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
