On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 09:29:22 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:02 -0400, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:37:31 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > + { "CPU E620T", 110000 },
> > > + { "CPU E640T", 110000 },
> > > + { "CPU E660T", 110000 },
> > > + { "CPU E680T", 110000 },
> >
> > This probably won't work either, as for an unknown reason Intel did not
> > encode the model number for at least some of these Atom CPUs:
> > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2011-June/033010.html
> > This is even the reason why we did not use the processor name strings
> > back then.
> >
> Ah, now I remember. That explains why I didn't find any online logs with
> those IDs. Would be great to find PCI bridge ID we could use instead ...
You can read the whole thread, to see if this was already discussed. I
seem to recall we did and concluded it wasn't an option, but I could
remember wrongly.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
