Quoting "R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Guenter,
-----Original Message-----
From: lm-sensors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces@lm-
sensors.org] On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 10:08 PM
To: lm-sensors
Cc: Guenter Roeck
Subject: [PATCH RFC] hwmon: (coretemp) Improve support for
TjMax detection on Atom CPUs
Atom CPUs don't have a register to retrieve TjMax. Detection so far is
incomplete. Use the X86 model ID to improve it.
Thanks for the patch...
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Wonder if we can improve TjMax detection for Atom CPUs with this code.
Anyone with Atom CPUs out there for some testing ?
I can test it out on the Medfield platform (Atom based).
You will need Jean's pending patch for that, to detect the new Atom CPU model.
But its Tjmax is 90 C. I don't see any 90 C values in your array.
is there a reason behind it ?
Hi Durga,
If you look closely at the patch, you will notice that the Atom code
starts with
tjmax = 90000;
90 degrees C is thus the default case. The table only includes values
for CPUs with a different tjmax. That keeps the table a bit smaller.
Or we can add as we find more models ?
Definitely ...
Thanks,
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
