Hello Jean, Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, 18:02:34 schrieb Jean Delvare: > Hi Alexander, > > On Wed, 30 May 2012 17:55:25 +0200, Alexander Stein wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2012, 13:29:56 schrieb Jean Delvare: > > > @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ Process Processor TjMax(C) > > > N475/470/455/450 100 > > > N280/270 90 > > > 330/230 125 > > > + E680/660/640/620 90 > > > + E680T/660T/640T/620T 110 > > > > > > 45nm Core2 Processors > > > Solo ULV SU3500/3300 100 > > > > Maybe it makes sense to state here explicitly that the 110 degree TjMax for the E6XXT series cannot be autodetected and the user should use tjmax module parameter. > > Same holds for many other models, unfortunately, but there's no reason > to treat the E600T series differently. Well, you can't treat them differently actually. But a hint why the detected tjmax might not match would be very helpfull. Alexander -- Dipl.-Inf. Alexander Stein SYS TEC electronic GmbH August-Bebel-Str. 29 D-07973 Greiz Tel: +49-3661-6279-0, Fax: +49-3661-6279-99 eMail: Alexander.Stein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Internet: http://www.systec-electronic.com Managing Director: Dipl.-Phys. Siegmar Schmidt Commercial registry: Amtsgericht Jena, HRB 205563 _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
