On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 06:15:38AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:18:35 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The original code looks a little weird though. Some of the defined > > constants aren't used, "offset" is used where "shift" should be. > > Introducing function sign_extend16 would also make the code more > > readable. I'll send a patch... > > ... or not. My patch makes the binary larger, so it's pointless. > And that after I saved an entire byte on x86_64 with my patch :). Cleaning up the unused constants makes sense, though. I'll prepare a patch for -next. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
